Skip to content

Conversation

@pmPaulis
Copy link
Contributor

@pmPaulis pmPaulis commented Mar 31, 2025

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Implementing this feature will improve workflow clarity, enhance team communication, and ensure accountability in task reassignments. By making justifications a standard part of the process, users will have better insights into task changes, leading to a more efficient and transparent work environment.

PRD - Reassignment Capability

Figma - Reassignment Capability

How to Test

Go to Preview and click in Reassign

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@gproly gproly self-requested a review April 1, 2025 12:17
gproly and others added 4 commits April 8, 2025 15:48
 ## Description:
- The following API to assign (reasign) a user needs to receive a comment
- or in order to register a TASK COMMENT

 ## Related Tickets & Packages
https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-23421
FOUR-23421 S1: BE - The comments needs to use in comment to Endpoint
@pmPaulis
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmPaulis commented Apr 9, 2025

@pmPaulis pmPaulis marked this pull request as ready for review April 14, 2025 22:13
Copy link
Contributor

@gproly gproly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved

FOUR-23423 S2: BE - A list of users from the groups or users able to …
@pmPaulis
Copy link
Contributor Author

checks-pass-free

pmPaulis and others added 2 commits May 19, 2025 19:24
FOUR-24106: There is not placeholder in comment filed in Reassignment form
@vladyrichter
Copy link

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-60d150e210.engk8s.processmaker.net

@pmPaulis pmPaulis removed the Beta1 label May 21, 2025
henryjonathanquispe and others added 2 commits May 21, 2025 15:53
FOUR-23891: UI: The Assign button needs to block for avoid send the comments a more than one time
@vladyrichter
Copy link

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-60d150e210.engk8s.processmaker.net

fagubla and others added 2 commits May 29, 2025 16:34
FOUR-24105:Cancel and Assignment buttons are not in the correct position in the Reassignment form
@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@pmPaulis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Team,
Updated with develop 4.15.4

@pmPaulis pmPaulis changed the title FOUR-22597: [SUMMER 25] Reassignment Capability - Observations and adjustments FOUR-22597: [SUMMER 25] Reassignment Capability - Observations and adjustments. Aug 1, 2025
@pmPaulis pmPaulis changed the title FOUR-22597: [SUMMER 25] Reassignment Capability - Observations and adjustments. FOUR-22597: [SUMMER 25] Reassignment Capability - Observations and adjustments Aug 11, 2025
pmPaulis and others added 3 commits August 19, 2025 12:40
FOUR-24108:Reassignment form is not hidden in tasks where the "Allow Reassignment" option is not enabled.
@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@nolanpro nolanpro merged commit 52c9bc8 into develop Dec 2, 2025
8 checks passed
@nolanpro nolanpro deleted the epic/FOUR-22597 branch December 2, 2025 22:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants